The Africans Time publishes rankings, comparisons and reviews to help readers understand African economies, companies, markets, projects, investment activity, technology and infrastructure.
The purpose of this methodology is to make clear what may be evaluated, which sources are preferred, how comparability is considered and how commercial relationships are kept separate from editorial ranking decisions.
What We Evaluate
Rankings and comparisons may cover:
- African economies and macroeconomic indicators;
- countries and regional markets;
- companies and corporate performance;
- investment activity and project pipelines;
- infrastructure projects;
- energy markets and projects;
- mining and critical minerals;
- technology and telecommunications;
- fintech and digital payments;
- trade and logistics;
- currencies and economic indicators;
- data centres and digital infrastructure;
- regional development indicators;
- other Africa-focused business, economic and policy comparisons.
Not every ranking is a recommendation. Some rankings simply compare measurable scale, performance, project status or market characteristics. The meaning of the ranking depends on the metric or criteria disclosed for that specific comparison.
Source Hierarchy
Primary and authoritative data sources are preferred because they can provide direct evidence of official figures, filings, regulatory status, ownership, project documentation or institutional decisions.
Secondary sources may provide useful context, but they do not automatically replace available primary evidence for a measurable claim.
Evaluation Criteria
- Relevance
- How directly the item fits the subject of the comparison and whether the available evidence is sufficient to include it meaningfully.
- Data Quality
- The reliability, recency and comparability of available information.
- Transparency
- Availability of ownership, methodology, pricing, regulatory or operational information relevant to the evaluation.
- Scale or Performance
- Relevant measurable indicators such as revenue, capacity, growth, market size or production where those indicators fit the ranking.
- Availability
- Whether a product, service or project is actually available or operational rather than only proposed or announced.
- Pricing and Value
- Used where reliable pricing data exists and price is material to the comparison.
- Features or Capabilities
- Used for technology, platforms and services where functional differences matter.
- Safety and Compliance
- Used where legal, regulatory or safety standards are material to understanding the item being reviewed.
- Reputation and Track Record
- Based on documented information rather than unsupported promotional claims.
- Execution
- Whether an announced project has progressed into approval, financing, construction or operation.
Not every criterion applies to every ranking. The criteria used should reflect the subject being evaluated rather than forcing unrelated factors into every comparison.
Scoring and Ordering
Not all rankings use a numerical score.
Some are ordered directly by an objective metric such as:
- GDP;
- growth rate;
- market capitalisation;
- investment value;
- installed capacity;
- production volume;
- subscriber numbers;
- project size.
Other rankings use editorial assessment based on disclosed criteria.
Where a numerical score is used, the methodology should explain the components, weighting and relevant source data where material. Where no numerical score is used, readers should not assume that an undisclosed formula determined the order.
Comparability Across African Markets
Countries and markets cannot always be compared directly because the same indicator can be measured under different economic, statistical or regulatory conditions.
Where relevant, rankings should account for differences in:
- population;
- market size;
- currency;
- inflation;
- reporting periods;
- regulation;
- economic structure;
- data availability;
- statistical methodology.
A larger absolute number does not automatically mean stronger relative performance. Context can materially change what a headline figure means.
Project and Investment Rankings
Project rankings require particular attention to implementation status because announced value and completed investment are not the same measure.
Where relevant, The Africans Time distinguishes between:
- proposed;
- announced;
- agreed;
- approved;
- financed;
- in procurement;
- under construction;
- operational;
- delayed;
- suspended;
- cancelled.
A ranking of announced investment should not be presented as a ranking of completed or deployed investment unless the underlying data supports that conclusion.
Reviews
A review may combine factual information and editorial judgement.
Where relevant, we distinguish between:
- verified specifications;
- pricing;
- availability;
- regulatory or safety information;
- objective performance data;
- editorial interpretation;
- subjective assessment.
Editorial judgement should not be presented as objective fact. Readers should be able to understand which parts of an assessment come from measurable information and which reflect editorial evaluation.
“Best” and “Top” Lists
Terms such as “best” or “top” should be supported by stated criteria or an identifiable metric.
A “best” list does not imply that one option is universally best for every reader, company, investor or market. Different needs, countries, regulations and circumstances can make different choices appropriate.
User Reviews
The Africans Time does not currently operate a public user-review or comment system.
Current rankings should therefore not be described as based on The Africans Time user ratings.
If external user-review data is used in a specific article, its source and role should be identified rather than presented as first-party audience data.
Commercial Separation
What Advertisers Cannot Buy
- an editorial ranking position;
- a better editorial score;
- a positive independent review;
- a favourable editorial recommendation.
Paid visibility does not determine editorial ranking position.
Advertising or sponsorship may appear around a ranking where appropriate, but commercial placement must remain separate from editorial ordering and methodology.
Affiliate Relationships
The Africans Time does not currently operate an affiliate-marketing programme.
Current rankings and reviews are not influenced by affiliate commissions.
Updates and Corrections
Rankings may change when:
- new economic data is released;
- official statistics are revised;
- pricing changes;
- regulations change;
- companies are acquired or close;
- product availability changes;
- projects are delayed, completed or cancelled;
- incorrect data is corrected;
- the methodology is revised.
If a factual error affects a ranking, The Africans Time may correct the underlying data and revise the result. A ranking that changes because newer data becomes available is not automatically evidence that the earlier version contained an error.
Missing or Incompatible Data
An item may be excluded where reliable comparable data is unavailable.
This can occur when information is materially outdated, the methodology is incompatible, the underlying claim cannot be verified, or including the item would create a misleading comparison.
Exclusion for insufficient data should not be interpreted automatically as a negative assessment of the company, country, project or service itself.
Limitations
No ranking captures every factor relevant to every reader.
Readers should remember that data can be revised, market conditions change, regulations change, projects can be delayed or cancelled, and different valid methodologies can produce different results.
Rankings and reviews are informational and journalistic. They are not personalised financial, investment, legal, tax, medical or other professional advice.
Feedback
- General ranking or methodology feedback
- [email protected]
- Factual corrections
- [email protected]
Addis Ababa 1000
Ethiopia